Legal Opinion
New York University v. Farkas
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 2, 1983PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
How summary should summary proceedings be? That question arises in connection with this motion made by the landlord for discovery.
The essential facts are these:
This summary holdover proceeding is premised upon allegations that the respondent does not occupy the premises as her primary residence. (Emergency Tenant Protection Act, L 1974, ch 576, §4, as amd by L 1983, ch 403, hereinafter called the Omnibus Housing Act.) The respondent tenant disagrees, contending that the premises are her primary residence.
Under section 55 of the Omnibus Housing Act, which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Antillean Holding Co. v. LindleyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Dubowsky v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- 42 West 15th Street Corp. v. FriedmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CarrollAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Cox v. J.D. Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Matter of Georgetown Unsold Shares, LLC v. LedetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Park South Associates v. MasonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- 65 Central Park West, Inc. v. GreenwaldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- 41-47 Nick LLC v. Odumosu, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2024
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.