Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OWEN, District Judge.
Following the ten-day trial of this action, plaintiff Meredith Corp. and additional defendants Brian Sutton-Smith and Prentice-Hall, Inc. conceded in their post-trial memorandum: “It is apparent from the record and in fairness to the Court and to the other parties, plaintiff and additional defendants are prepared to admit, based on a detailed study of the record, that in some respects (involving less than eleven percent of the Brian Sutton-Smith book) something more than fair use of the Mussen, Conger and Kagan text was made.” (Br. p. 13). And further that “ . .…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edward Thompson Co. v. American Law Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Meredith Corporation v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Consolidated Music Publishers, Inc. v. Hansen Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Q-Co Industries, Inc. v. HoffmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- SAS Institute, Inc. v. S & H Computer Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985