Q-Co Industries, Inc. v. Hoffman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiff Q-Co Industries, Inc. (“Q-Co”) has moved for a preliminary injunction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, seeking to bar defendants Sidney Hoffman (“Hoffman”), Dilip Som (“Som”) and Computer Prompting Corp. (“CPC”) from selling their CPC-1000 program which is alleged to infringe Q-Co’s copyrighted VPS-500 program. The defendants have cross-moved to enjoin Q-Co from interfering with the development of the CPC-1000 program and from representing itself to the sole owner of the VPS-500 program. Both programs are software designed to permit use of personal computers…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Weightman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.