Legal Opinion

United States v. Hashmi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 16, 2008No. 06 Cr. 442 (LAP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LORETTA A. PRESEA, District Judge.

Before the Court are motions by Defendant Syed Hashmi challenging the constitutionality of (i) the Classified Information Procedures Act, 18 U.S.C.App. 3, § 1, et seq. (“CIPA”), (ii) requiring his attorneys to obtain a security clearance prior to engaging in discovery, and (iii) the special administrative measures (“SAMs”) imposed by the Acting Attorney General pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 501.3, which place certain limitations on communications between the Defendant and his attorneys. 1 Defendant’s motions are denied for the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. DrakeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. United States v. GhailaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. United States v. HitselbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. United States v. MohamedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Moussaoui (PS) v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API