Legal Opinion

Drake v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1994No. F017904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (W. A.), Acting P. J.

Here we face two primary questions: (1) the remedy available to subsequent purchasers when a prior land sale transaction to which they were not parties violates the Subdivided Lands Act (Bus. & Prod. Code, § 11000 et seq.), and (2) the subsequent purchasers’ rights pursuant to a release clause contained in a blanket deed of trust which the , original parties did not perform.

This is the second appeal in this case. The previous appeal resulted in a reversal with directions to the trial court to consider further evidence and to make factual findings regarding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Buehler v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Howdershell v. HowdershellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Yuba Cypress Housing Partners, Ltd. v. Area DevelopersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. G.C.I., Inc. v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of West Hollywood v. 1112 Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. In Re GonzalezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API