Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Thompson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 5, 1918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On petition for divorce a vinculo for desertion.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, Y. C.

The parties were married at Peekskill, Yew York, April 19th, 1913, and went to Montreal to live. In February, 1914, they moved to Trenton, where they set np housekeeping, and where the petitioner engaged in business. Tn May the defendant-visited her former home in Poughkeepsie to consult her family physician regarding her pregnancy. It was understood that the visit was to be of short duration, but by mutual understanding it was extended from time to time and finally it was arranged that she should stay until after the baby was born. Tn the meanwhile, the petitioner spent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feickert v. FeickertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Richmond v. SangsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Reik v. ReikNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Webb v. WebbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  5. Fried v. FriedNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API