Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Sangster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1919No. 1563PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallam County ; Reese Tatum, Judge. Suit by Matilda Richmond and another against John C. Sangster. From judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, joined pro forma by her second husband, H. E. Richmond, sued appellee, Sangster, alleging, in substance, that Mrs. Richmond and appellee were married about the year 1883; that their marriage relation continued until the 1st day of October, 1914, when they were legally divorced, and that after said date she married her coplaintiff, H. E. Richmond; that during the existence of the marriage relation between appellant and appellee they accumulated community property of the estimated value of $40,000, consisting of lands in Hansford and Sherman counties, real estate in Dalhart, Tex.,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Dunham v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Way v. WayIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Olmsted v. . OlmstedNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ball v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Harwell v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1969
  4. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Hayes v. Texas Employers' Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API