Legal Opinion

Clark v. W. L. Pearson & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1930No. 8353PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

■ ' During the period in which the transactions involved in this litigation occurred, the city of Robstown, in Nueces county, embraced a population of more than 1,000 and less than 5,000 inhabitants. By vote of its inhabitants, said city accepted the benefits and adopted the provisions of chapter 0, tit. 28, of the present Revised Statutes (article 1086 et seq.), as provided in article 1104 thereof. Acting-under the provisions of this chapter, the city council, by ordinances, ordered the paving of certain streets within the corporate limits and levied special assessments against owners of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herring v. City of MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Keel v. PulteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Bridgers v. City of LampasasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Booth v. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. W. L. Pearson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Vogel v. Central Texas Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Scanlan v. Continental Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Shambaugh v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. LanghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API