Legal Opinion
Scanlan v. Continental Inv. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1940No. 10868PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
Our opinion on the former appeal of this case is reported under the style of Scanlan et al. v. Continental Investment Company, Tex.Civ.App., 93 S.W.2d 1189.
On June 12, 1929., the City Council of the City of Houston, upon the petition of the owners of more than 51% of the front-footage of the property abutting on that part of Lceland Avenue between Scott Street and Telephone Road, adopted a resolution to pave it. This was after proper notices to the then owners of the property here involved, and after a hearing duly had on benefits at which said owners did not appear or make any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Emery v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Herring v. City of MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Fisher v. L. E. Whitham & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris County Flood Control District v. Kerr, Edward A. and Normal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Lofstedt v. Gulf Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Harris County Flood Control District v. Kerr, Edward A. and Normal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Lofstedt v. Gulf Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944