Security Bank Trust Co. of Memphis, Tenn. v. Laney
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This was an action on negotiable promissory notes, and several special pleas were interposed, but the record discloses that all pleas except 1 and 3 were withdrawn before the cause was submitted to the jury. Indeed, counsel for the appellant, in their brief, concede that the general issue and the plea of non est factum presented the only issue that was submitted to the jury. This being the ease, any rulings made in reference to the pleas that were eliminated if erroneous was error without injury. Southern R. R. v. Bunt, 131 Ala. 591, 32 So. 507; L. & N. R. R. v. Lile, 154 Ala. 556, 45 So.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Southern Railway Co. v. BuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Lytle & Co. v. Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Advisory Opinion to GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Cameron v. LanierArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Bank of Moulton v. RankinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.