Bank of Moulton v. Rankin
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
The judgment entry recites, in substance, that all defendants, other than M. R. Rankin, and all counts of the complaint other than counts 6 and 7, were stricken out, on motion of the plaintiff. This action on the part of the plaintiff cured whatever error there was — and we think there was manifest error in sustaining the demurrers to those of the “stricken” counts, known as the “common counts”- — in the action of the court in sustaining the demurrers to the counts of the complaint other than counts 6 and 7, above. Security Bank & Trust Co., etc., v. Laney, 214 Ala. 561, 108 So. 367. The suit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Commercial Bank v. Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- City National Bank v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- National Bank v. BerrallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- McMahen v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Steiner Bros. v. ClisbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Foster v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Wilson v. CowartAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
- First National Bank of Portland v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Rankin v. LileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934