Legal Opinion

Bank of Moulton v. Rankin

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1930No. 8 Div. 980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The judgment entry recites, in substance, that all defendants, other than M. R. Rankin, and all counts of the complaint other than counts 6 and 7, were stricken out, on motion of the plaintiff. This action on the part of the plaintiff cured whatever error there was — and we think there was manifest error in sustaining the demurrers to those of the “stricken” counts, known as the “common counts”- — in the action of the court in sustaining the demurrers to the counts of the complaint other than counts 6 and 7, above. Security Bank & Trust Co., etc., v. Laney, 214 Ala. 561, 108 So. 367. The suit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Commercial Bank v. Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. City National Bank v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. National Bank v. BerrallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  4. McMahen v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Steiner Bros. v. ClisbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Commercial Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Foster v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Wilson v. CowartAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. First National Bank of Portland v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rankin v. LileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API