Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Mount Vernon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The City of Mount Vernon, from a judgment of the County Court of Westchester county, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 13th day of September, 1897, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The purpose of this action is to recover the value of certain medical services, claimed by the plaintiff to have been rendered at the instance and request of the defendant, in pursuance of a contract executed by it through its board of health. The board of health of the defendant which made the contract was created by the charter of the defendant (Chap. 182, Laws of 1892), section 220 of which provides that the board of health shall consist of the mayor, supervisor *582and the health officer of the city. Such board of health is given power to prescribe regulations for vaccination, and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. People v. NeffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. In re BernardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. In re Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Rogers v. McCoachNew York Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API