Legal Opinion

Rogers v. McCoach

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by George Clifford Rogers, by his guardian ad litem, William Clifford Rogers, against the County of Orange, in which the defendant county was allowed to interplead John D. McCoach and others. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

This is an action brought to recover the reward offered by the board of supervisors of the county of Orange for information resulting- in the apprehension and conviction of the murderers of Frederick and Willis Olney and Alice Ingerick.

- The three persons named were murdered in the town of Wallkill, Orange county, on the 6th of October, 1905. Investigations shortly thereafter made indicated that the murders were committed by one Charles H. Rogers, who lived in the city of Middletown in that county. He left home on the morning of the day of the homicide and did not return. On the 16th of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hatch v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. People v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Fitch v. . SnedakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Howland v. . LoundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Jones v. . the Phoenix BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elkins v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API