Legal Opinion

O'Gorman v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 21, 1992No. 91SC642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals in O’Gorman v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 826 P.2d 390 (Colo.App.1991), which held that the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (Panel) had jurisdiction to enter an order signed by only two of the four Panel members. We find that section 2-4-110, IB C.R.S. (1980), which allows the grant of authority to a public body to be conferred on a majority of the members, is applicable here. Since the action of two Panel members exceeded the Panel’s statutory authority, we reverse.

I

Due to a back injury suffered in the course…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinney v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Natkin & Co. v. EubanksColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. O'Gorman v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Campbell v. IBM Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People, in Interest of GwrColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API