Legal Opinion
Natkin & Co. v. Eubanks
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1989No. 88CA1108PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISCHBACH, Judge.
Petitioners, Natkin Company and Travelers Indemnity Company, seek review of the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which set aside and remanded, for lack of sufficient findings, the order of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarding Jim 0. Eubanks (claimant) permanent partial disability payments. Petitioners also assert that the Panel erred in setting aside the AU’s order allowing them to offset against the award of permanent partial disability payments certain rehabilitation maintenance overpayments. We dismiss the petition for review.
While a workmen’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- American Exp. v. Industrial Com'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- CF & I Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Denver v. Colorado Division of Employment & TrainingColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Haynes v. Interior InvestmentsColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martinez v. Regional Transportation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- O'Gorman v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Huddy v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- O'Gorman v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Orth v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.