Legal Opinion
Cleveland Window Glass & Door Co. v. National Surety Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1928No. 20664PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The claim of the Cleveland Window Glass & Door Company against the National Surety Company for material furnished for use in the construction of the building of the Wade Chateau Company is based upon the theory that the bond executed to the Guardian Savings & Trust Company, trustee for the bondholders, inured to the benefit of those who furnished labor and material for said building.
There can be no doubt as to the real purpose of this bond. A consideration of all the terms and conditions makes clear that purpose, which was to indemnify and save harmless the bondholders represented by the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Trinova Corp. v. Pilkington Bros., P.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Portsmouth Insurance Agency v. Medical MutualOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Clark v. Meigs Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.