Legal Opinion

Heying v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1987No. 46A04-8612-CR-362PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Daniel Heying appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle after having been adjudged an habitual traffic offender. Two constitutional issues are raised by this appeal:(1) whether the statute under which Heying was convicted is unconstitutionally vague in that it failed to inform him that he was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle in the State of Indiana even if he possessed a valid driver's license from another state; and

whether the statute under which Heying was convicted violated Hey-ing's fundamental right to travel by prohibiting him from operating a motor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Berlinghieri v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Heninger v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terpstra v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Reynolds v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Femia v. Administrative Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Magee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. VanKirk v. Boyer (In re Barnes)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API