Heying v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Daniel Heying appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle after having been adjudged an habitual traffic offender. Two constitutional issues are raised by this appeal:(1) whether the statute under which Heying was convicted is unconstitutionally vague in that it failed to inform him that he was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle in the State of Indiana even if he possessed a valid driver's license from another state; and
whether the statute under which Heying was convicted violated Hey-ing's fundamental right to travel by prohibiting him from operating a motor…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Berlinghieri v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Heninger v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Terpstra v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Femia v. Administrative Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Magee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- VanKirk v. Boyer (In re Barnes)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.