Legal Opinion

Wheeling, St. Clairsville & Cambridge Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1932No. 23301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Allen, J.).

This case arises as an error proceeding to an order of the Public Utilities Commission, which granted to the Eastern Ohio Transport Corporation an extension of its certificate of pub- lie convenience and necessity No. 99, from Barnesville, Ohio, to Cambridge, Ohio, through Bailey’s Mills, Quaker City, Salesville, Lore City and Kipling. The main objection of the plaintiff in error, which is a motor transportation company, to the extension in. question is that the Public Utilities Commission in extending certificate No. 99 should have imposed a restriction as to through…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API