Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

' I dissent from the conclusions reached in the application of the facts to the law. I have no quarrel with the analysis of the applicable statutes, as stated by Justices Stanford and Morgan. Justice Morgan states that “The testimony was sufficient to justify a finding that the plaintiff was not adequately furnishing all service necessary between Tuscon and Florence.” The Corporation Commission did not find that public convenience and necessity required further or additional service than that furnished by appellee between Florence and Tucson or between Tucson and Florence.

The legal…