Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. Elton
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.
The issue presented by this case is whether the trial court erred in limiting its award of attorney fees pursuant to RSA 281:37-a to those fees incurred during the appeal process. We hold that it did not.
Following the death of her husband, the defendant filed a claim for workmen’s compensation against the plaintiffs, Seppala & Aho Construction Company (Seppala), her husband’s employer, and Seppala’s workmen’s compensation insurance carrier, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman’s). Fireman’s contested this claim and the department of labor held a hearing. The decision was deferred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Couture v. Mammoth Groceries Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- All American Engineering Co. v. PriceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Bothwick v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Appeal of BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- City of Manchester v. DoucetSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.