Legal Opinion

Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. Elton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 17, 1979No. 79-071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether the trial court erred in limiting its award of attorney fees pursuant to RSA 281:37-a to those fees incurred during the appeal process. We hold that it did not.

Following the death of her husband, the defendant filed a claim for workmen’s compensation against the plaintiffs, Seppala & Aho Construction Company (Seppala), her husband’s employer, and Seppala’s workmen’s compensation insurance carrier, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (Fireman’s). Fireman’s contested this claim and the department of labor held a hearing. The decision was deferred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Couture v. Mammoth Groceries Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. All American Engineering Co. v. PriceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galloway v. Chicago-Soft, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Bothwick v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Appeal of BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. City of Manchester v. DoucetSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API