Legal Opinion

Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1977No. 7659PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This case determines whether an award of counsel fees pursuant to RSA 281:37-a (Supp. 1975) was “reasonable” as to amount. We hold that it was. This appeal arises from a motion by plaintiff seeking counsel fees, pursuant to RSA 281:37-a (Supp. 1975), that were incurred in a workmen’s compensation claim in which plaintiff prevailed in both the superior court and upon a subsequent appeal to this court. See Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc., 116 N.H. 181, 355 A.2d 421 (1976).

Following a hearing, the superior court awarded plaintiff counsel fees of one-third of any “benefits received to date as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mussman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Bradbury v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. Couture v. Mammoth Groceries Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. McCabe v. ArcidySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Scheele v. Village District of EidelweissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Drop Anchor Realty Trust Charlotte Marshall v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Town of DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API