Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case determines whether an award of counsel fees pursuant to RSA 281:37-a (Supp. 1975) was “reasonable” as to amount. We hold that it was. This appeal arises from a motion by plaintiff seeking counsel fees, pursuant to RSA 281:37-a (Supp. 1975), that were incurred in a workmen’s compensation claim in which plaintiff prevailed in both the superior court and upon a subsequent appeal to this court. See Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc., 116 N.H. 181, 355 A.2d 421 (1976).
Following a hearing, the superior court awarded plaintiff counsel fees of one-third of any “benefits received to date as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Mussman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Bradbury v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Couture v. Mammoth Groceries Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- McCabe v. ArcidySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Scheele v. Village District of EidelweissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Drop Anchor Realty Trust Charlotte Marshall v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Town of DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.