Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'Sullivan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Mary O’Sullivan, executrix of the estate of William J. O’Sullivan, Jr., appeals from an order of the Superior Court {Morrill, J.) awarding her attorney’s fees for successfully defending, in the superior and supreme courts, a workers’ compensation appeal brought by the plaintiff, Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. The defendant contends that the court improperly applied the law governing fee determinations by disregarding her contingent fee arrangement with counsel and by setting a fee using the factors listed in Rule 1.5(a) of the New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct. We affirm.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Burnham v. DowningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Cheshire Toyota/Volvo, Inc. v. O'SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. EltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Manchester v. DoucetSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Appeal of Thomas PhillipsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- In re Estate of RolfeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Globe Distributors, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co. (In re Globe Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Adolph Coors Co. v. Globe Dist.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.