Legal Opinion

Berger v. Lodge

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1928No. Docket No. 6158PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHEY, J., pro tem.

This is an action for declaratory relief and to determine the legality of a conditional sales contract for the purchase of an automobile. The question at issue is whether or not the contract violates the Usury Law of the state of California. The trial court held the contract was legal and enforceable and gave judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on which judgment the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

After disposing, by stipulation, of the formal and generally immaterial paragraphs of the pleadings by the respective parties, the cause was submitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Holland-O'neal Milling Co. v. RawlingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Wilson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Levine v. Nolan Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Pacific Finance Corp. v. LaumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Ricker v. Fay Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API