Legal Opinion

Holland-O'neal Milling Co. v. Rawlings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

This is a suit to recover the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment went against plaintiff on the note, and in favor of defendants on a counterclaim. Failing to get a new trial plaintiff appealed.

The petition is in the conventional form. The answer in effect pleads that the payments made, excluding alleged usury, exceeded the amount due, and then follows a counterclaim to recover the alleged usury paid. The reply is a general denial.

The transactions which gave rise to the note in suit were had between defendant G. T.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Anderson & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  3. Lucas v. Beco Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Wyatt v. Commercial Credit CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. In Re BibbeyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API