Holland-O'neal Milling Co. v. Rawlings
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
This is a suit to recover the balance alleged to be due on a promissory note. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment went against plaintiff on the note, and in favor of defendants on a counterclaim. Failing to get a new trial plaintiff appealed.
The petition is in the conventional form. The answer in effect pleads that the payments made, excluding alleged usury, exceeded the amount due, and then follows a counterclaim to recover the alleged usury paid. The reply is a general denial.
The transactions which gave rise to the note in suit were had between defendant G. T.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Anderson & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- Lucas v. Beco Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Wyatt v. Commercial Credit CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- In Re BibbeyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.