Legal Opinion

Ricker v. Fay Securities Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 2, 1931No. Docket No. 6115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

A judgment having been rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the purchaser of a conditional sale contract for triple the amount of alleged interest on deferred payments, the latter appealed therefrom.

The respondent entered into a contract in writing for the purchase of an automobile from a dealer who subsequently sold said contract to the appellant herein for an amount equal to the retail price .of the car if sold for cash. By the terms of their agreement the original parties recited payment upon its execution of a specified sum, and divided the remainder into eighteen equal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. France v. MunroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Murphy v. Agen.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Brown v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Conway v. SkidmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API