Legal Opinion

Leach v. Mechanics Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, C. J.

Two primary questions ■ are propounded on this appeal. First: Does a draft drawn in the ordinary form constitute an- assignment pro tanto, in law or in equity, of the funds in the hands of the drawee to the credit of the drawer before the acceptance or certification of such draft? Second: Do the record facts, other than the mere execution and delivery of the drafts .involved in this action, disclose and constitute an assignment of the funds in question so that a court of equity will recognize the holder’s claim as superior to that of the receiver of the drawer, appointed after the issuance of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Roberts v. Austin Corbin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Dolph v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Leach v. Iowa State Savings Bank of ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Leach v. Citizens' St. Bank of ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Standard Oil Co. (Ind.) v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API