Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1989No. 17465PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a driving under the influence (DUI) case. The primary issue presented is whether the trial court properly prohibited and suppressed evidence concerning breath tests using an Intoximeter 3000 with a deactivated Taguchi cell. We hold that the Intoximeter 3000 with a deactivated Taguchi cell was approved by the department of health and welfare (the Department) for use as a direct breath testing instrument. No further certification of the instrument was required. We also hold that the Lewiston police department was approved by the Department as a forensic alcohol…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. Van SickleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. PolakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. State v. FaughtIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. BradleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API