State v. Wilson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a driving under the influence (DUI) case. The primary issue presented is whether the trial court properly prohibited and suppressed evidence concerning breath tests using an Intoximeter 3000 with a deactivated Taguchi cell. We hold that the Intoximeter 3000 with a deactivated Taguchi cell was approved by the department of health and welfare (the Department) for use as a direct breath testing instrument. No further certification of the instrument was required. We also hold that the Lewiston police department was approved by the Department as a forensic alcohol…
2Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Van SickleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. PolakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. FaughtIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BradleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.