Legal Opinion

State v. Faught

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1995No. 21296PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

NATURE OF THE CASE

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence following a jury trial. The appellant challenges the trial court’s admission of statistical probability evidence that the appellant was the perpetrator of the rape based on comparison of DNA evidence, the sufficiency of the remainder of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the propriety of the sentence imposed.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On September 23, 1993, the appellant, Gene “Gino” Allen Faught (Faught), was charged pursuant to subsections (1) and (4) of section 18-6101 of the Idaho Code…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. IwakiriIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. VarieIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. KonechnyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API