Legal Opinion
Steigleder v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 19, 1948No. Civ. 7025PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit brought by Frank N. Steigleder against Eberhard Faber Pencil Company, Jordan Marsh Company, William Filene’s Sons Company, R. H. White Company, Thorp and Martin Company, and James R. Armington for an accounting for profits and damages and a preliminary and final injunction against further infringement by said defendants. The defendants move for summary judgment on the pleadings, deposition of the plaintiff, and admissions of fact made by the plaintiff, under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Prouty and Mears v. RUGGLESSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Grant v. KopplCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alex Lee Wallau, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Montmarquet v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Johnston v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
- George H. Magrath v. Draper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.