Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants Donald and Signe Bergeson sued respondent United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance (USF & G), the workers’ compensation carrier of Donald Berge-son’s employer, for intentional obstruction of workers’ compensation benefits under Minn.Stat. § 176.82 (1984).
Appellants and respondent moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment on appellant’s action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Subsequently, the court denied appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issues of intentional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Coleman v. American Universal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Everfield v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Burk v. Thorson, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999