Legal Opinion

Cockey v. Mead

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2023No. A177424Published

1Opinion of the Court

526 Argued and submitted December 9, 2022, affirmed March 8, 2023 Scott COCKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George MEAD, an individual and The Mead Law Firm, P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Defendants-Respondents. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV25628; A177424

526 P3d 1201

In this legal malpractice case, plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is time-barred. The parties dispute whether, under the statute-of-limitations dis- covery rule, harm accrues before or after the conclusion of litigation that arises…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bollam v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API