Cockey v. Mead
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
526 Argued and submitted December 9, 2022, affirmed March 8, 2023 Scott COCKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George MEAD, an individual and The Mead Law Firm, P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Defendants-Respondents. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CV25628; A177424
526 P3d 1201
In this legal malpractice case, plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is time-barred. The parties dispute whether, under the statute-of-limitations dis- covery rule, harm accrues before or after the conclusion of litigation that arises…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Bollam v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.