Legal Opinion
Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1982No. 80-1850PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented in this case is whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 has the authority or the duty under Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act 2 to review the allocation of a pipeline’s purchased gas costs pursuant to its tariff-filed PGA clause when the pipeline applies for increased rates pursuant to Section 4 without proposing any “change” in the allocation procedure.
Intervenor United Gas Pipe Line Company is a major interstate pipeline company with purchase and delivery facilities located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and adjacent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hodge v. SeilerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Estate of L. D. French v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Gillring Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Florida Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Laclede Gas Company and United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- ANR Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.