Legal Opinion
East Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 9, 1988No. 87-1765PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
WALD, Chief Judge:
Petitioner East Tennessee Natural Gas Company (“East Tennessee”) seeks review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) requiring East Tennessee to eliminate its minimum commodity bill from its partial requirements rate schedule. We find substantial evidence to support the Commission’s determination that the bill is unjust and unreasonable.
East Tennessee’s petition raises the further question of whether FERC can order the elimination of the minimum bill retroactively to the effective date of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a Division of Tenneco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Transwestern Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Transcanada Pipelines Limited v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1229Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern California Gas Company, Conoco, Incorporated, Arizona Public Service Company, Gas Company of New Mexico, Southern Union Gas Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern California Gas Company, Conoco, Incorporated, Arizona Public Service Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Gas Company of New Mexico, Southern Union Gas Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Union Electric Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- "Complex" Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.