Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 2016No. A15-1461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHUTICH, Justice.

Appellant Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler was charged with felony issuance of a dishonored check, Minn.Stat. § 609.535, subd. 2 (2014), when her check for past-due property taxes was returned for insufficient funds. The district court dismissed the criminal complaint, concluding that Schouweiler’s check met the statutory exception for “a check given for a past consideration,” id., subd. 5 (2014). The court of appeals reversed, and Schouweiler petitioned for review. We conclude that “a check given for a past consideration” means a check given for a good or service that was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Harrell v. CederbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. Hillcrest Center, LLC v. Ton Real Estate Investments III, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  5. Op. Atty. Gen. 622i-11, Minnesota Attorney General Reports2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API