Legal Opinion
Dome Pipeline Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1989No. Docket 100809PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtG. R. Deneweth, J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the Michigan Public Service Commission denying Dome Pipeline’s application for authorization to construct a lateral pipeline to connect Dome’s existing pipelines to Guardian Industries Corporation for the purpose of making deliveries of liquid ethane.
Plaintiff Dome Pipeline Corporation is a Delaware corporation, authorized to transact business in Michigan, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dome Petroleum Corporation, a North Dakota corporation, which is in turn wholly owned by Dome Petroleum, Ltd., a Canadian corporation. Dome Pipeline owns…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Steel Corp. v. LongDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- National Steel Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- National Steel Corp. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- National Steel Corporation v. Michigan Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990