Legal Opinion

National Steel Corp. v. Long

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 12, 1989No. G86-88-CA5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This case presents a challenge to a prospective exercise of regulatory jurisdiction by the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”). In a seven-count complaint, plaintiffs allege the MPSC is without authority to regulate a proposed delivery of liquid ethane to Nation Steel Corporation.1 Now before the Court are two motions which place at issue only four of the seven counts. Plaintiffs move for voluntary dismissal of count VII, without prejudice, and for summary judgment as to counts I, II and III.

I

The facts material to the present…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. of Permanent and Temporary Rights of Way for the Transportation of Ethane, Propane, Liquid Petroleum Gas, and other Petroleum Products in the Twp. of North Middleton, Cumberland County, PA ~ Appeal of: R.S. MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. National Steel Corp. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. National Steel Corporation v. Michigan Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API