Legal Opinion

State v. Garrett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1991No. 17795PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The defendant-appellant Michael J. Garrett challenges the district court’s admission into evidence of the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus test (or HGN test) administered to Garrett by the police officer who had stopped him for driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI). Garrett also appeals the use of two prior DUI convictions to enhance his present conviction to the status of a felony. We affirm the district court.

In the early morning of March 11, 1988, Garrett was stopped by police officer Gary Fost for driving straight through an intersection from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. BarkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API