State v. Doe
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a finding that a juvenile was within the purview of the Juvenile Corrections Act because he engaged in conduct that would, if he had been an adult, have constituted the crime of malicious injury to property in violation of Idaho Code § 18-7001. The juvenile contends that there was insufficient evidence to find that he was within the purview of the Act. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 12, 2001, thirteen-year-old John Doe, his twin brother, and a sixth-grade classmate were walking through a weed-infested vacant lot on their way to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ClokeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. HumpherysIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Head v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CarverIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LampienIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BarclayIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ThorngrenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MunozIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. James Leroy SkunkcapIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.