Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1986No. 253A85PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence the knife seized from his bedroom pursuant to an allegedly invalid third party consent search. At trial, defendant contested the identity and therefore the authority of the woman who allowed the search. He argues on appeal that the trial court’s findings of fact that his mother consented to the search are not supported by competent evidence.

On direct examination prior to the voir dire hearing conducted to determine the admissibility of the knife, Deputy Sheriff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API