Legal Opinion
United States v. Lustig
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 11, 1947No. 9191PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant and Thomas E. Reynolds (who does not appeal) were convicted under two joint indictments based on R.S. Sec. 5430, March 4, 1909, c. 321, Sec. 150, 35 Stat. 1116, 18 U.S.C.A. § 264. Counts 1 and 2 of the first indictment charge them with counterfeiting obligations of the United States. Count 3 charges possession of certain materials with the intent to use them for counterfeiting. Both counts of the second indictment charge possession of obligations executed in part after the similitude of obligations of the United States. Appellant was sentenced to five…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gambino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John F. GrismoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Bruce Everett HarrodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Nathan Shurman and Louis Chebatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.