Davis v. Guideone Mutual Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAILEY.
{1 In these consolidated appeals, Gui-deOne Mutual Insurance Company (Gui-deOne), appeals the trial court's judgment and award of attorney fees in favor of plaintiff, Patricia Davis. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand with directions.
T2 On appeal, the primary issue is whether, under the former Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (CAARA),1 GuideOne had to disclose various personal injury protection (PIP) benefit options to Davis when she became the named insured on an automobile policy which had originally been issued to her ex-husband. We conclude that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Webb v. Glenbrook Owners Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ParfreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arrabelle at Vail Square Residential Condominium Association, Inc. v. Arrabelle at Vail Square LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mordhorst Cleaning v. CardamoneColorado Court of Appeals · 2024