Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Ashkins
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1929PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These are actions of tort. According to the writs the plaintiffs are residents of Boston and the defendant is a resident of Minneapolis in the State of Minnesota. ' There are allegations in each declaration in substance that the plaintiff, while in the exercise of due care and travelling in an automobile on a highway in Danvers in this Commonwealth, was injured through the negligence of the defendant, his servants or agents, in operating an automobile whereby there was a collision and the plaintiff was caused bodily injury, *376suffering and loss of time and expenses. There are further…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Whitney v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Commonwealth v. MercierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Cutter v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. D'AGOSTINOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Commonwealth v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Hogan v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Ott v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.