Legal Opinion
Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1989No. 19-35027PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
CORNELIUS BLACKSHEAR, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Court must rule on a motion made by the defendants of this adversary proceeding to strike the demand for a jury trial made by the plaintiff.
Facts
The adversary proceeding arises put of a real estate contract entered into by The Chaplin Group (“Chaplin”) and The Harbi-son Group (“THG”), a co-defendant in this suit. THG is a South Carolina general partnership which owns, develops and sells approximately seven hundred fifty (750) acres of developed and undeveloped real estate (the “Realty”) located in the counties of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hassett v. Bancohio National Bank (In Re CIS Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Glannon v. Carpenter (In Re Glannon)District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Light Foundry Associates v. Alter (In Re Light Foundry Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Finley (In Re Washington Manufacturing Co.)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1991
- Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.