Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1994No. S-92-949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In this contract action, the plaintiff-appellant, Mark Murphy, seeks to recover overtime pay from the defendant-appellee, City of Lincoln, Nebraska, under the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement. The district court affirmed the denial of the grievance Murphy filed with the City of Lincoln Personnel Board. He then appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting that the district court erred in, among other things, determining that the agreement was ambiguous and thus was subject to interpretation. We removed the matter to this court in order to regulate the caseloads…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Plambeck v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Neujahr v. NeujahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Delicious Foods Co. v. Millard Warehouse, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Crowley v. McCoyNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Union Ins. Co. v. Land and Sky, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. New Light Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kropp v. Grand Island Public School District No. 2Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Daehnke v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. C.S.B. Co. v. IshamNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API