Legal Opinion
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1993No. C7-92-1667, C1-92-1695PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
This litigation arises out of an accounting malpractice lawsuit and has been the subject of two decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Buysse v. Baumann-Fur-rie & Co., 448 N.W.2d 865 (Minn.1989) (.Buysse I) and Buysse v. Baumann-Fur-rie & Co., 481 N.W.2d 27 (Minn.1992) (Buysse II). The focus of this appeal is whether the trial court erred by awarding respondents/judgment creditors prejudgment interest on the $500,000 judgment awarded by the supreme court against appellant/garnishee St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent/defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Aon Risk Services, Inc. Of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004