Legal Opinion
Hudson v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1976No. 11086PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Justice.
This case presents the issues of whether the search warrant set forth probable cause for a search and whether an appeal of a criminal case may be summarily affirmed.
Petitioner-appellant-defendant Rudolph Hudson was charged with possession of marijuana and possession of lysergic acid diethylamide. The jury convicted him of both counts. Petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals which granted summary affirmance pursuant to N.M.R. Crim.App. 601(b)(1) [§ 41-23A-601 (b)(1), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1975)]. We granted certiorari.
In the final analysis petitioner raises two issues on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jaben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Garrison Ex Rel. Estate of Garrison v. Safeway StoresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of PernellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.