Legal Opinion

Ryle v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2004No. 49A02-0405-CR-423PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In March 2003, the State charged Kenna Ryle with Murder. A jury found him guilty of the lesser-included offense of Voluntary Manslaughter, a Class A felony. The trial court entered judgment of convietion and sentenced him to an enhanced term of forty-five years. Ryle now appeals and presents the following issue for review: whether the trial court improperly imposed an enhanced sentence under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), reh'g denied.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On February 25, 2003, Ryle shot Maurice…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Anthony J. SmalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Joshua John BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Ryle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Calloway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API