Legal Opinion

Ryle v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2005No. 49S02-0505-CR-207PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

When the trial court ordered an enhanced sentence for appellant Kenna D. Ryle's manslaughter conviction, it cited his four juvenile adjudications and the fact that he was on probation when he committed the crime. Our analysis of Apprendi v. New Jersey leads us to conclude that these factors are proper sentencing considerations for a trial judge and need not be submitted to a jury.

Facts and Procedural History

Kenna Ryle shot and killed Maurice Sanders at an apartment complex in Indianapolis on February 25, 2003. The State charged Ryle with murder, unlawful possession of a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Welch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API