Legal Opinion

Spitzer v. Mid Continent Constr., Unpublished Decision (11-15-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2007No. 89177UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellants, Sharon Spitzer and 82nd Street Market, Inc., appeal the trial court's ruling, which granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, City of North Royalton. After a thorough review of the record, and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On May 4, 2006, appellants filed suit against several defendants, including Mid Continent Construction Company, Inc., National City Bank, and the City of North Royalton, alleging negligence, disturbance and diversion of natural water course, reasonable use, trespass, nuisance, gross negligence, and other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Portage County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ivory v. Austintown Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Slacas v. KCI Technologies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API