Legal Opinion
Southeast Resource Recovery Facility Authority v. Dravo Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1992No. 91-56241PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Montenay International Corp. (MIC) and its subsidiary Montenay Pacific Power Corp. (MPPC) appeal a district court order staying arbitration between MPPC and Dravo Corp. MIC and MPPC argue that *712Dravo was bound by an earlier state court decision refusing to stay arbitration and that the federal district court erroneously interpreted California law. The district court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1988). MIC and MPPC filed a timely notice of appeal on September 18, 1991, and this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(2) (appeal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Worldwide Church of God v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Southeast Resource Recovery Facility Authority City of Long Beach v. Montenay International Corporation Montenay Pacific Power Corporation, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellants v. Dravo Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Earl v. State of AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Humphries v. ButtonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Lawler v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.